An interesting discussion came up in my public health lecture today. We were talking about food poverty and the factors that shape children’s diets when, right on cue, someone voiced an opinion I see everywhere, both in real life and online:
“It’s down to parenting.”
“I was raised to eat what was on my plate or I would go hungry.”
It’s a familiar refrain. I don’t know this individual’s personal circumstances, but this childhood anecdote likely reflects an experience from more than 15 years ago, which probably isn’t far off my own, over four decades back (I can’t actually remember 😂). But here’s the key issue: those eras are not comparable to the food and social landscapes families are navigating today.
The world parents are raising children in today is fundamentally different.
Many families no longer live near extended support networks. Dual-working households are now a necessity rather than a choice for most. Time, energy, money, and mental load are stretched thinner than ever.
Food itself has changed too. Ultra-processed options are engineered for convenience, taste, and long shelf-life, often making them cheaper, quicker, and more accessible than fresh foods. Advertising is targeted, persuasive, and relentless, particularly toward children. Screens mean kids see more food cues in a single day than adults saw in a week 30 years ago.
So when we talk about personal responsibility, we must ask:
Do we really believe personal responsibility looks the same for everyone?
For the wealthy and the poor?
For those with health challenges and those without?
For people working three jobs and people with the luxury of time?
How can it? Personal responsibility doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It exists within systems, and the system has changed dramatically.
Healthcare professionals must be careful not to amplify blame.
When a child’s diet is poor, pointing the finger solely at parents may feel intuitive, but it’s overly simplistic and deeply unhelpful. It ignores structural barriers and fuels stigma, often directed at the very people who need support, not judgment.
In our lecture we revisited the Five A’s, a framework used in public health nutrition that captures the real-world factors families are up against:
1. Accessibility
Is healthy food physically available? Do families live near shops offering fresh produce, or only convenience stores and takeaways?
2. Affordability
Even when available, is it financially within reach? With food prices rising, “healthy choices” can become unrealistic choices.
3. Availability
Are nutrient-dense foods consistently stocked? Rural and deprived areas often face limited options.
4. Acceptability
Do the available foods align with cultural practices, preferences, or sensory needs (especially important for children with neurodivergence or sensory challenges)?
5. Accommodation
Do shops and services support people’s circumstances, opening hours, transport, ability to shop without a car, or food preparation equipment at home?
When we zoom out and consider the 5 A’s, the narrative shifts. It becomes clear that what looks like a “parenting issue” is often an environmental, economic, and structural issue.
So where does this leave responsibility?
Of course parents play a role; that’s undeniable. But so do policymakers, educators, food manufacturers, advertisers, and health professionals. Responsibility is shared, not dumped on the shoulders of those already carrying the heaviest loads.
If we want healthier children, the answer isn’t to resurrect stories of “clean your plate” childhoods from decades ago. It’s to understand and address the complex, modern realities shaping family life today.
Because compassion and context will get us much further than blame ever will.
